| click on SIEPR Discussion paper number for abstract
and to download pdf file unless otherwise
noted. |
|
Discussion
Papers arranged by date
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-021
Collaborative Research in e-Science and Open Access to Information
Paul A. David, Matthijs den Besten, and Ralph Schroeder
January 2009
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-020
The Need to Return to a Monetary Framework
John B. Taylor
January 2009
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-019
Taste-based Discrimination:
Empirical Evidence from a Shock to Preferences during WWI
Petra Moser
January 2009
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-017
A note on uncertainty and discounting
in models of economic growth
Kenneth J. Arrow
January 2009
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-015
Do Better Schools Lead to More Growth? Cognitive Skills, Economic Outcomes, and Causation
Eric Hanushek and Ludger Woessmann
January 2009
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-014
Assignment Messages and Exchanges
Paul Milgrom
December 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-013
Simplified Mechanisms with an Application to Sponsored-Search Auctions
Paul Milgrom
December 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-012
Comparing Open and Sealed Bid Auctions: Evidence from Timber Auctions
Susan Athey, Jonathan Levin, Enrique Seira
December 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-010
Will e-Science Be Open Science?
Paul A. David, Matthijs den Besten, Ralph Schroeder
December 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-008
Some Critical Episodes in the Progress of Medical Innovation: An Anglo-American Perspective
Nathan Rosenberg
November 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-009
Modern Management: Good for the Environment of Just Hot Air?
Nicholas Bloom, Christos Genakos, Ralf Martin, Raffaella Sadum
October 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-006
Estimating Welfare in Insurance Markets Using Variation in Prices
Liran Einav, Amy Finkelstein, and Mark R. Cullen
October 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-005
PRESCHOOLERS ENROLLED AND MOTHERS AT WORK? THE EFFECTS OF UNIVERSAL PRE-KINDERGARTEN
Maria Donovan Fitzpatrick
October 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-002
How Successful Have Trade Unions Been ?: A Utility-Based Indicator of Union Well-Being
John Pencavel
October 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-003
Community-Based Production of Open Source Software: What do we know about the developers who participate?
Paul A. David and Joseph S. Shapiro
October 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-007
Not-so-classical measurement errors: a validation study of Homescan
Liran Einav, Ephraim Leibtag, and Aviv Nevoy
September 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-001
Preschoolers Enrolled and Mothers at Work? The Effects of Universal Pre-Kindergarten
Maria Donovan Fitzpatrick
September 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-004
Central Bank Misperceptions and the Role
of Money in Interest Rate Rules
Guenter W. Beck and Volker Wieland
August 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-054
Be as careful of the company you keep as of the books you
read. Peer effects in education and on the labor market
Giacomo DeGiorgi, Michele Pellizzari, and Silvia Redaelli
August 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-052
The Political Economy of Heterogeneous Development:
Quantile Effects of Income and Education
Marcus Alexander, Matthew Harding, and Carlos Lamarche
August 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-051
Testing Self-Selection in Migration: Evidence from the Israeli Kibbutz
Ran Abramitzky
August 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-053
Testing for Common Values in Canadian Treasury Bill Auctions
Ali Horta and Jakub Kastl
July 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-050
Marrying Up: the Role of Sex Ratio in Assortative Matching
Ran Abramitzky, Adeline Delavande, Luís Vasconcelos
July 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-018
Contract Enforcement and Institutions among the Maghribi Traders:
Refuting Edwards and Ogilvie
Avner Greif
June 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
08-011
Mapping e-Science’s Path in the Collaboration Space: Ontological Approach to Monitoring Infrastructure Development
Paul A. David, Matthijs den Besten
June 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-047
Pricing and Welfare in Health Plan Choice
M. Kate Bundorf, Jonathan D. Levin, and Neale Mahoney
June 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-046
Further Results on a Black Swan in the Money Market
John B. Taylor and John C. Williams
May 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-044
Insurance Policies for Monetary Policy in the Euro Area
Keith Kuester and Volker Wieland
May 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-045
Beyond the Market Advisory Committee: Proceedings from a Workshop held at Stanford University, January 15, 2008
Charles D. Kolstad, Oren Ahoobim, Nick Burger, Corbett Grainger, and Shaun McRae
April 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-049
Is Hanukkah responsive to Christmas?
Ran Abramitzky, Liran Einav, and Oren Rigbi
March 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-041
Stiff Competition: Vertical Relationships in Cremation Services
Lori Parcel
March 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-038
Cooperation and Self-Governance in Heterogeneous Communities
Juan F. Escobar
March 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-037
Women’s Liberation: What’s in It for Men?
Matthias Doepke and Michèle Tertilt
March 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-036
Restricting Access to Books on the Internet: Some Unanticipated Effects of U.S. Copyright Legislation
Paul A. David and Jared Rubin
March 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-034
The Role of Cognitive Skills in Economic Development
Eric A. Hanushek and Ludger Wößmann
March 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-048
The Limits of Equality: Insights from the Israeli Kibbutz
Ran Abramitzky
February 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-035
Economic Projections and Rules-of-Thumb for Monetary Policy
Athanasios Orphanides and Volker Wieland
February 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-042
Preferences and Choice Constraints in Marital Sorting:
Evidence From Korea
Soohyung Lee
January 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-040
Understanding the Income Gradient in College Attendance in
Mexico: The Role of Heterogeneity in Expected Returns to Colleg
Katja Maria Kaufmann
January 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-039
Brazilian Ethanol: A Gift or Threat to the Environment and Regional Development?
Sriniketh Nagavarapu
January 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-033
"Only Connect": Academic-Business Research Collaborations and the Formation of Ecologies of Innovation
Paul A. David and J. Stanley Metcalfe
January 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-032
Low-Income Demand for Local Telephone Service:
Effects of Lifeline and Linku
Daniel A. Ackerberg, Michael H. Riordan, Gregory L. Rosston, and Bradley S. Wimmer
January 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-028
CEO Compensation for Major US Companies in 2006
Samia El Baroudy, Ruth Levine and Ling Shao
January 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-027
Why Media Regulation is so Tempting
Bruce M. Owen
January 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-031
Beyond Revealed Preference Choice Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics
B. Douglas Bernheim and Antonio Rangel
December 2007
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-025
Cohort Effects in Wages and Promotions
Illoong Kwon and Eva Meyersson Milgrom
December 2007
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-024
“It Takes All Kinds”: A Simulation Modelling Perspective on Motivation and Coordination in Libre Software Development Projects
Jean-Michel Dalle and Paul A. David
December 2007
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-023
Designing Institutional Infrastructure for E-Science
Paul A. David and Michael Spence
December 2007
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-022
Dynamics of Innovation in an “Open Source” Collaboration Environment: Lurking, Laboring and Launching FLOSS Projects on SourceForge
Paul A. David and Francesco Rullani
December 2007
This paper is an extensive revision of Discussion paper No. 06-005, which it replaces
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-043
Evaluating Skilled Experts:
Optimal Scoring Rules for Surgeons
Kyna Fong
November 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-020
Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997
Nicholas Bloom, Rachel Griffith and John Van Reenen
November 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-019
Understanding an Emergent Diversity of Corporate
Governance and Organizational Architecture:
An Essentiality-Based Analysis
Masahiko Aoki and Gregory Jackson
October 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-018
Linking Economic and Social-Exchange Games:
From the Community Norm to CSR
Masahiko Aoki
October 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-017
The Economic Significance of Executive Order 13422
Roger G. Noll
October 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-008
Simplified Mechanisms with Applications to
Sponsored Search and Package Auctions
Paul Milgrom
October 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-016
News and Business Cycles in Open Economies
Nir Jaimovich and Sergio Rebelo
September 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-009
Distributional and Efficiency Impacts of
Increased U.S. Gasoline Taxes
Lawrence H. Goulder
September 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-005
Firm-Specific Information and the Efficiency of Investment
Anusha Chari and Peter Blair Henry
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-004
Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculation
Peter Blair Henry
September 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-003
Housing and Monetary Policy
John B. Taylor
September 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-002
Playing with Fire: Cigarettes, Taxes
and Competition from the Internet
Austan Goolsbee, Michael Lovenheim and Joel Slemrod
September 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-030
Social Image and the 50-50 Norm A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects
James Andreoni and B. Douglas Bernheim
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-001
U.S. Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim, from Fordney-
McCumber to the Trade Expansion Act of 1962:
A Political-Economic Analysis
Lei (Sandy) Ye
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-046
Designing an Effective Program of State-Sponsored Human Embryonic Stem-Cell Research
Roger G. Noll
June 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-045
Rational Diverse Beliefs and Economic Volatility
Mordecai Kurz
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-044
Diverse Beliefs and Time Variability of Risk Premia
Mordecai Kurz and Maurizio Motolese
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-043
Understanding the Increased Time to the Baccalaureate Degree
John Bound, Michael F. Lovenheim and Sarah Turner
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-040
How Far to the Border?: The Extent and Impact
of Cross-Border Casual Cigarette Smuggling
Michael F. Lovenheim
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-007
State-Dependent or Time-Dependent Pricing: Does It Matter for Recent U.S. Inflation?
Peter J. Klenow and Oleksiy Kryvtsov
July 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-006
Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India
Chang-Tai Hsieh and Peter J. Klenow
July 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-042
A Test of Confidence Enhanced Performance:
Evidence from US College Debaters
Jonathan Meer and Edward D. Van Wesep
July 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-041
How Much do Real Estate Brokers Add? A Case Study
B. Douglas Bernheim and Jonathan Meer
July 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-039
Science, Technology and Innovation for Economic Growth:
Towards Linking Policy Research and Practice in ‘STIG Systems’
Philippe Aghion, Paul A. David and Dominique Foray
July 2007 (revised October 2008) |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-038
THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF ‘OPEN SCIENCE’
Paul A. David
June 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-029
A Solution Concept for Majority Rule in Dynamic Settings
B. Douglas Bernheim and Sita Nataraj Slavov
May 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-036
The Value of Intellectual Property Rights to Firms
Christine Greenhalgh and Mark Rogers
May 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-035
Priorities for Telecommunications Reform in Mexico
Roger G. Noll
May 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-026
Status, Relative Pay, and Wage Growth: Evidence from M&A
Illoong Kwon and Eva Meyersson Milgrom
April 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-037
When Should Control Be Shared?
Eva Meyersson Milgrom, Paul Milgrom, and Ravi Singh
April 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-032
China’s Competition Policy Reforms: The Antimonopoly Law and Beyond
Bruce M. Owen, Su Sun, Wentong Zheng
April 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-013
Firm Dynamics, Markup Variations, and the Business Cycle
Nir Jaimovich
March 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-012
Income Effects and Indeterminacy
in a Calibrated One-Sector Growth Model
Nir Jaimovich
March 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-010
The Young, the Old, and the Restless:
Demographics and Business Cycle Volatility
Nir Jaimovich and Henry E. Siu
March 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-034
Trade Marks and Performance in UK Firms: Evidence of
Schumpeterian Competition through Innovation
Christine Greenhalgh and Mark Rogers
March 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-029
The Causes and Consequences of Ballot Order-Effects
Marc Meredith and Yuval Salant
February 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-027
A Multi-Dimensional Signaling Model of Campaign Finance
Brendan Daley and Erik Snowberg
February 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-025
The Effect of Employer-Provided General Training on Turnover: Examination of Tuition Reimbursement Programs
Colleen N. Flaherty
February 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-024
Separating Psychological Costs from Time Costs: Female Labor Supply and Participation in Food Stamps and WIC
Colleen Flaherty and Kevin Mumford
February 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-019
Optimal Payment Cards Fees
Assaf Eilat
February 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-016
BROADCASTING AND TEAM SPORTS
Roger Noll
February 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-015
The Net Neutrality Debate:
Twenty Five Years after United States v. AT&T and 120 Years after the Act to Regulate Commerce
Bruce M. Owen
February 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-021
Uncertainty and the Dynamics of R&D
Nicholas Bloom
January 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-033
Isolating the Causal Impact of Community College Enrollment on Educational
Attainment and Labor Market Outcomes in Texas
Darwin W Miller, III
January 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-031
Who Cares for the Elderly? Intrafamily Resource Allocation and Migration in Mexico
Francisca Antman
January 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-020
The Optimal Tax Treatment of Families with Children
Kevin J. Mumford
January 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-026
Cyclical Wage Movements in Emerging Markets Compared to Developed Economies: A Contractual Approach
Nan Li
January 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-022
Price Control In Franchised Chains: The Case Of McDonald's Dollar Menu
Itai Ater and Oren Rigbi
January 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-030
All-Pay Contests
Qingmin Liu
December 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-023
All-Pay Contests
Ron Siegel
December 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-021
Implicit Social Security Tax Rates over the Life Cycle
Gopi Shah Goda
December 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-017
The Effect of Access Regulation on Broadband Deployment
Amitay Alter
December 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-028
Economics of Patent Pools When Some (but not all) Patents are Essential
Daniel Quint
November 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-018
Selling to Overconfident Consumers
Michael D.Grubb
November 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-014
Growth and Poverty Reduction Under Globalization: The Systematic Impact of Exchange Rate Misalignment
Yasuyuki Sawada and Pan A. Yotopoulos
December 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-013
Are Burdensome Registration Procedures an
Important Barrier on Firm Creation? Evidence
from Mexico
David Kaplan,
Eduardo Piedra and
Enrique Seira
December 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-005
Micro-dynamics of Free and Open Source Software Development: Lurking, laboring and launching new projects on
SourceForge
Paul A. David and Francesco Rullani
December 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-011
SPORTS ECONOMICS AT FIFTY
Roger G. Noll
November 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-010
EUROPE’S UNIVERSITIES AND INNOVATION
-- PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
Paul David
March 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-015
Behavioral Theories of the Business Cycle
Nir Jaimovich and Sergio Rebelo
October 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-011
Firm Dynamics and Markup Variations: Implications for Sunspot
Equilibria and Endogenous Economic Fluctuation
Nir Jaimovich
October 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-009
Linking Policy Research and Practice in ‘STIG Systems’:
Many Obstacles, but Some Ways Forward
Philippe Aghion, Paul A. David and Dominique Foray
October 2006
This paper has been replaced by Science, Technology and
Innovation for Economic Growth: Towards Linking Policy Research and Practice in ‘STIG Systems’,
06-039 -- October 2008
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-008
PATH DEPENDENCE – A FOUNDATIONAL CONCEPT
FOR HISTORICAL SOCIAL SCIENCE
Paul David
May 2005 (revised January 2007; extensive revision October 2006) |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-006
Mandatory versus Voluntary Disclosure of Product Risks
A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell
October 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-004
Economic policy analysis and the Internet: Coming to terms with a telecommunications anomaly
Paul A. David
October 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-014
Can News About the Future Drive the Business Cycle?
Nir Jaimovich and Sergio Rebelo
September 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-003
Risk Premia, Diverse Belief and Beauty Contests
Mordecai Kurz and Maurizio Motolese
September 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-001
Accounting for the Rise in Consumer Bankruptcies
Igor Livshits, James MacGee, Michèle Tertilt
September 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-007
A Multi-dimensional View of the “Sustainability”
of Free & Open Source Software Development
-
Sustaining Commitment, Innovation
and Maintainability with Growth
Paul A. David
August 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-002
Beauty Contests Under Private Information and
Diverse Beliefs: How Different?
Mordecai Kurz
August 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-021
Are Female Workers Less Productive Than Male Workers?
Trond Petersen, Vemund Snartland, and Eva M. Meyersson Milgrom
August 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-020
Distributive Justice and CEO Compensation
Guillermina Jasso and Eva M. Meyersson Milgrom
August 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-019
The Rise and Fall of Third-party High-speed Access
Gregory L. Rosston
August 2006 (Revised August 2008) |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-012
Trade Costs, Asset Market Frictions and Risk Sharing: A Joint Test
Doireann Fitzgerald
July 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-018
Innovation and the Evolution of Market Structure for Internet Access in the United States
Shane Greenstein
July 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-017
Appropriability and Commercialization: Evidence from MIT Inventions
Emmanuel Dechenaux, Brent Goldfarb, Scott Shane, Marie Thursby
June 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-016
Public Enforcement of Law
A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell
May 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-015
Reflections on the Patent System and
IPR Protection in the Past, Present and Future
Paul A. David
April 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-014
Whither Japan’s Corporate Governance?
Masahiko Aoki
March 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-013
Mechanisms of Endogenous Institutional Change
Masahiko Aoki
March 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-012
Efficiency with Endogenous Population Growth
Mikhail Golosov, Larry E. Jones, and Michèle Tertilt
March 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-009
INCOME MOBILITY OF INDIVIDUALS IN CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES
Niny Khor and John Pencavel
February 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-008
Discrete Time Duration Models with Group–level Heterogeneity
Anders Frederiksen, Bo E. Honoré, and Luojia Hu
February 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-007
Rising Wage Inequality: Does the Return to Management Tell the Whole Story?
Anders Frederiksen and Odile Poulsen
February 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-010
VALUING CONSUMER PRODUCTS BY THE TIME SPENT USING THEM: AN APPLICATION TO THE INTERNET
Austan Goolsbee and Peter J. Klenow
January 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-006
The Impact of "Deregulation" on Regulator Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of the Telecommunications Act of 1996
Gregory L. Rosston, Scott J. Savage, Bradley S. Wimmer
January 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-011
Digital Information Network Technologies, Organizational Performance and Productivity
Alexandre Caldas, Paul A. David, and Orges Ormanidhi
December 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-005
Economic Analysis of Law
A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell
November 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-004
The Theory of Public Enforcement of Law
A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell
October 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-002
China’s New Exchange Rate Policy: Will China
Follow Japan into a Liquidity Trap?
Ronald I. McKinnon
September 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-037
Corner Solutions, Crises, and Capital Controls:
A Theory and an Empirical Analysis on the Optimal Exchange Rate Regime
in Emerging Economies
Yasuyuki Sawada and Pan A. Yotopoulos
August 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-035
The Political Economy of Law:
Decision-Making by Judicial, Legislative, Executive and Administrative Agencies
Mat McCubbins, Roger Noll, and Barry Weingast
August 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-034
Hyperbolic Discounting and Uniform Savings Floors
Benjamin A. Malin
August 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-036
A Life Cycle Perspective on Changes in Earnings Inequality
Among Married Men and Women
John Pencavel
July 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-003
The Effects of Temptation
on the Optimal Provision of Education
Soohyung Lee
June 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-001
Can the Modular Helium Reactor Compete in the Hydrogen Economy?
Geoffrey Rothwell
June 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-033
Behavioral Public Economics:
Welfare and Policy Analysis with
Non-Standard Decision-Makers
B. Douglas Bernheim and Antonio Rangel
June 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-032
Production Targets
Guillermo Caruana and Liran Einav
June 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-031
Estimating Risk Preferences from Deductible Choice
Alma Cohen and Liran Einav June 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-030
Do Women Shy Away from Competition?
Do Men Compete too Much?
Muriel Niederle and Lise Vesterlund June 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-028
The Politics and Economics of Implementing State-Sponsored Embryonic Stem-Cell Research
Roger G. Noll June 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-029
Child Nutrition in India in the Nineties:
A Story of Increased Gender Inequality?
Alessandro Tarozzi and Aprajit Mahajan
May 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-027
Innovation and Universities' Role
In Commercializing Research Results:
Second Thoughts about the Bayh-Dole Experiment
Paul A. David
May 2005
Replaced by updated version
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 06-010
EUROPE’S UNIVERSITIES AND INNOVATION
-- PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
March 2006
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-023
Expectations, Bond Yields and Monetary Policy
Albert Lee Chun
May 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-022
PATH DEPENDENCE – A FOUNDATIONAL CONCEPT
FOR HISTORICAL SOCIAL SCIENCE
Paul David
May 2005
replaced with paper 06-008 October 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-021
Exchange Rate or Wage Changes in International Adjustment? Japan and China
versus the United States
Ronald McKinnon
May 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-019
Firm Fragmentation and Urban Patterns
Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, Pierre-Daniel Sarte, and Raymond Owens
May 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-018
Choice From Lists
Ariel Rubinstein and Yuval Salant
May 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-017
The Economic Impact of Wireless Number Portability
Minjung Park
May 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-015
Corporate Board Structure, Managerial Self-Dealing, and Common Agency
Vinicius Carrasco
April 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-013
Monetary Union with Voluntary Participation
William Fuchs and Francesco Lippi
April 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-012
Contracting with Repeated Moral Hazard and Private Evaluations
William Fuchs
April 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-011
Consumer Bankruptcy: A Fresh Start
Igor Livshits, James MacGee and Michele Tertilt
April 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-010
Competition Policy in Emerging Economies
Bruce M. Owen
April 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-024
Charter School Quality and Parental
Decision Making with School Choice
Eric A. Hanushek, John F. Kain, Steven G. Rivkin, and Gregory F. Branch
March 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-016
Retraining the Unemployed in a Matching Model with Turbulence
Felix Reichling
March 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-009
A Damage-Revelation Rationale
for Coupon Remedies
A. Mitchell Polinsky and Daniel L. Rubinfeld
March 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-008
"Buyer Power" and Economic Policy
Roger G. Noll
March 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-007
Communications Policy for 2005 and Beyond
Reed E. Hundt and Gregory L. Rosston
March 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-026
Does Educational Tracking Affect Performance and Inequality?
Differences-In-Differences Evidence Across Countries
Eric A. Hanushek and
Ludger Wößmann
February 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-025
The Market for Teacher Quality
Eric A. Hanushek,
John F. Kain,
Daniel M. O’Brien, and
Steven G. Rivkin
February 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-006
Measuring the Ex-Ante Social Cost of Aggregate Volatility
Mordecai Kurz
February 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-020
Offshoring in a Knowledge Economy
Pol Antràs, Luis Garicano, and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg
January 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-014
Evidence on the Returns to Secondary Vocational Education
Jonathan Meer
January 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-004
Diverse Beliefs, Forecast Errors and Central Bank Policy
Mordecai Kurz
January 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-003
Advancing Economic Research on
the Free and Open Source Software Mode of Production
Jean-Michel Dalle,
Paul A. David,
Rishab A. Ghosh, and
W.E. Steinmueller
December 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-002
Simulating Code Growth in Libre (Open-Source) Mode
Jean-Michel Dalle and Paul David
November 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-001
Towards a cyberinfrastructure
for enhanced scientific collaboration: Providing its ‘soft’ foundations may be the hardest part
Paul David
August 2004 Revised May 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-040
Antitrust in China: The Problem of Incentive Compatibility
Bruce M. Owen, Su Sun, Wentong Zheng
September 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-039
OptimalPatronage, Reputation, and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution:
From Keeping ‘Nature’s Secrets’ to the Institutionalization of ‘Open Science’
Paul David
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-038
Optimal Fines and Auditing When Wealth is Costly to Observe
A. Mitchell Polinsky
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-037
The Optimal Use of Fines and Imprisonment When Wealth is Unobservable
A. Mitchell Polinsky
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-036
The Lovely but Lonely Vickrey Auction
Lawrence M. Ausubel and Paul Milgrom
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-035
Ascending Proxy Auctions
Lawrence M. Ausubel and Paul Milgrom
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-034
The Clock-Proxy Auction:
A Practical Combinatorial Auction Design
Lawrence M. Ausubel, Peter Cramton, and Paul Milgrom
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-032
A Flexible Economy? Entrepreneurship and Productivity in New Zealand
John McMillan
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-030
How to Subvert Democracy:
Montesinos in Peru
John McMillan and Pablo Zoido
July 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-033
Order Without Law? Property
Rights During the California Gold Rush
Karen Clay and Gavin Wright
May 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-028
Faculty Retirement Incentives
by Colleges and Universities
John Pencavel
May 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-027
Assigning Broadband Rights
Bruce M. Owen
May 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-025
Prediction Markets
Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz
April 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-023
Identifying Direct and Indirect Effects.
Estimating the Costs of Motherhood
Using Matching Estimators
Marianne Simonsen
and
Lars Skipper
April 2004 Revised August 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-020
The Effects of the Electoral Regime
on Trade Policy
John William Hatfield
and
William R. Hauk, Jr.
April 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-024
THE TALE OF TWO TRAVERSES
Innovation and Accumulation in the
First Two Centuries of U.S. Economic Growth
Paul A. David
March 2004
This is the December 2005 revision of the paper originally released in March 2004.
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-022
WThe Conflict Over Vertical Foreclosure
In Competition Policy And
Intellectual Property Law
Roger G. Noll
March 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-019
What Construction Cost Might Trigger
New Nuclear Power Plant Orders?
Geoffrey Rothwell
March 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-007
Accounting for Stock Options
Jeremy Bulow and John B. Shoven
March 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-005
Cost Contingency as the Standard Deviation of the Cost Estimate for Cost Engineering
Geoffrey Rothwell
February 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-031
Profit Sharing and the Role of Professional Partnerships
Jonathan Levin and Steven Tadelis
February 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-009
Imported Antitrust Law: Steel or Slag? A Review Essay
Bruce M. Owen
February 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-018
The Effect of Napster on Recorded
Music Sales: Evidence from the
Consumer Expenditure Survey
Seung-Hyun Hong
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-017
Real Exchange Rate Fluctuations
and Endogenous Tradability
Kanda Naknoi
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-016
Electricity Regulation in California
and Input Market Distortions
Mark R. Jacobsen and
Azeem M. Shaikh
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-015
Asymmetric Responses of Local Expenditures to
Changes in Intergovernmental Grants
Jaime Calleja Alderete
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-014
Optimal Second Price Auctions with
Positively Correlated Private Values
and Limited Information
Dan Quint
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-011
Empirically evaluating two-sided integrated
network effects: The case of electronic payments
Catherine Tucker
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-010
Improving Social Security’s Progressivity and Solvency With Hybrid Indexing
Robert Pozen, Sylvester J. Schieber, and John B. Shoven
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-008
Auctions, Matching and the Law of Aggregate Demand
John William Hatfield and Paul Milgrom
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-015
Asymmetric Responses of Local Expenditures to
Changes in Intergovernmental Grants
Jaime Calleja Alderete
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-014
Optimal Second Price Auctions with
Positively Correlated Private Values
and Limited Information
Dan Quint
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-011
Empirically evaluating two-sided integrated
network effects: The case of electronic payments
Catherine Tucker
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-010
Improving Social Security’s Progressivity and Solvency With Hybrid Indexing
Robert Pozen, Sylvester J. Schieber, and John B. Shoven
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-008
Auctions, Matching and the Law of Aggregate Demand
John William Hatfield and Paul Milgrom
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-029
Institutions and Impersonal Exchange:
The European Experience
Avner Greif
2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-013
Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law:
Public College Quality and
Higher Education Policies of U.S. States
Lei Zhang
December 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-006
Matching and Price Competition
Jeremy Bulow and Jonathan Levin
December 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-021
Fifty Years Of Economic Growth In
Western Europe: No Longer Catching Up
But Falling Behind?
Nicholas Crafts
November 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-012
How Effective are International Intellectual
Property Laws? Evidence from Patenting
Decisions in Agricultural Biotechnology
Phoebe Chan
November 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-005
Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law:
Divorce Laws and Family Distress
Betsey Stevenson and
Justin Wolfers
November 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-004
Remedies For Price Overcharges:
The Deadweight Loss Of Coupons And Discounts
A. Mitchell Polinsky and
Daniel L. Rubinfeld
November 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-003
Competition Policy in Latin America
Bruce M. Owen
November 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-001
Determinants of Stock Market Volatility and Risk Premia
Mordecai Kurz,
Hehui Jin and
Maurizio Motolese
October 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-002
Private Capital Flows and Default Risk
Mark L.J. Wright
September 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-045
Zvi Griliches on Diffusion, Lags and Productivity Growth …Conecting the Dots
Paul A. David
August 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-044
Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates?
A Reconciliation and New Results
Justin Wolfers
August 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-043
The Organization of Sports Leagues
Roger G. Noll
August 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-040
Urban Structure and Growth
Esteban Rossi-Hansberg and Mark L. J. Wright
August 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-042
Can ‘Open Science’ be Protected
from the Evolving Regime of IPR Protections?
Paul A. David
July 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-041
Auctions versus Negotiations in Procurement:
An Empirical Analysis
Patrick Bajari, Robert McMillan and Steven Tadelis
July 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-037
Local Broadband Access:
Primum Non Nocere or Primum Processi?
A Property Rights Approach
Bruce M. Owen and Gregory L. Rosston
July 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-034
The Role of Expectations in Economic Fluctuations
and the Efficacy of Monetary Policy
Mordecai Kurz and Hehui Jin
July 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-039
A Spatial Theory of Trade
Esteban Rossi-Hansberg
June 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-038
Organization and Inequality in a Knowledge Economy
Luis Garicano and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg
June 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-033
Disagreement about Inflation Expectations
N. Gregory Mankiw, Ricardo Reis, and Justin Wolfers
June 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-032
Legal Reform, Externalities and
Economic Development: Measuring the Impact of
Legal Aid on Poor Women in Ecuador
Bruce M. Owen and Jorge Portillo
May 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-031
Regulatory Reform:
The Telecommunications Act of 1996
and the FCC Media Ownership Rules
Bruce M. Owen
May 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-030
The Economic Logic of “Open Science” and the Balance between Private Property Rights and the Public Domain in Scientific Data and Information: A Primer
Paul A. David
March 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-029
Koyaanisqatsi in Cyberspace
Paul A. David
March 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-028
What do Financial Markets Think of War in Iraq?
Andrew Leigh, Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz
March 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-026
Coordinated Interaction and Clayton §7 Enforcement
Stuart D. Gurrea and Bruce. M Owen
March 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-036
Gross Seasonality and Underlying Seasonality: Evidence from the U.S. Motion Picture Industry
Liran Einav
February 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-035
A Theory of Endogenous Commitment
Guillermo Caruana and Liran Einav
February 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-027
The Allocation of Software Development Resources
in ‘Open Source’ Production Mode
Jean-Michel Dalle and
Paul A. David
February 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-022
Incentive Compensation and
the Quality of Disclosure
Ravi Singh
February 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-018
Invention under Uncertainty and the Threat of Ex Post Entry
David A. Miller
February 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-007
Coordination and Decomissioning: NSFNET and the Evolution
of the Internet in the United States, 1985-95
Eiichiro Kazumori
February 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-024
Information Dispersion and Auction Prices
Pai-Ling Yin
January 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-021
The Performance of California’s Natural Gas Market during the Electricity Crisis
Azeem M. Shaikh
January 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-020
Performance Evaluations over Time
Korok T. Ray
January 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-015
Too Many Mutual Funds?
—Financial Product Differentiation Over The State Space
Shujing Li
January 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-013
Social Influences and the Private Provision of Public Goods:
Evidence from Charitable Contributions in the Workplace
Katherine Grace Carman
January 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-012
The Limits of Arbitrage: Trading Frictions and
Deviations from Purchasing Power Parity
Asaf Zussman
December 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-009
Housing Collateral, Consumption Insurance
and Risk Premia
Hanno Lustig and
Stijn Van Nieuwerburg
December 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-006
Why Do Firms Use Incentives That
Have No Incentive Effects?
Paul Oyer
December 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-005
Why Do Some Firms Give Stock Options To All Employees?:
An Empirical Examination of Alternative Theories
Paul Oyer and Scott Schaefer
December 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-025
Income Distribution and the Allocation of Public Education Expenditure
Lei Zhang
November 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-023
Liquidity Premia in Dynamic Bargaining Markets
Pierre-Olivier Weill
November 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-017
The Venture Capital Keiretsu Effect:
An Empirical Analysis of Strategic Alliances Among
Portfolio Firms
Laura Lindsey
November 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-016
Labor Market Competition using
Compensation Schemes and Intertemporal Relationships
Jeremy T. Fox
November 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-003
Debt Relief:
What Do the Markets Think?
Peter Blair Henry and Serkan Arslanalp
November 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-004
Risk Sharing and Asset Prices:
Evidence From a Natural Experiment
Peter Blair Henry and Anusha Char
October 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-001
Reforming the Taxation of Human Capital:
A Modest Proposal for
Promoting Economic Growth
Paul A. David
October 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-014
Trading Costs and Home Bias: Evaluating a Proposal for Resolving the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle
Sean Buckley
September 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-011
Is Light Water Reactor Technology Sustainable?
Geoffrey Rothwell and Bob van der Zwaan
September 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-036
Economic Inequality and the Emergence of Child Labor Laws
Dirk Krueger and Jessica Tjornhom
August 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-034
Consumption and Saving over the Life Cycle:
How Important are Consumer Durables?
Dirk Krueger and Jesús Fernández-Villaverde
August 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-033
Does Income Inequality Lead to Consumption
Inequality? Evidence and Theory
Dirk Krueger and Fabrizio Perri
August 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-031
The Economics of the Supreme Court's Decision On Forward Looking Costs
Gregory L. Rosston and Roger G. Noll
August 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-030
Local Telephone Rate Structures:
Before and After the Act
Gregory L. Rosston and Bradley S. Wimmer
August 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-029
Patent Oppositions
Jonathan Levin and Richard Levin
August 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-028
A Theory of Partnerships
Jonathan Levin and Steven Tadelis
August 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-027
Federal R&D in the Anti-Terrorist Era
Roger G. Noll
July 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-032
On the Optimal Progressivity of the Income Tax Code
Dirk Krueger and Juan Carlos Conesa
June 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-026
The Productivity Surge of the Nineties and Future Growth
Robert M. Coen and Bert G. Hickman
May 2002 - Revised February 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-025
Identification and Inference in Nonlinear
Difference-In-Differences Models
Susan Athey and Guido W. Imbens
May 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-002
Capital Account Liberalization:
Allocative Efficiency or Animal Spirits?
Peter Blair Henry and Anusha Chari
April 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-035
Skill-specifc rather than General Education:
A Reason for Slow European Growth?
Dirk Krueger and Krishna B. Kumar
April 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-024
The Economics of Scientific Research Coalitions:
Collaborative Network Formation in the
Presence of Multiple Funding Agencies
Paul A. David and Louise C. Keely
April 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-023
Currency Substitution, Speculation and Crises:
Theory and Empirical Analysis
Yasuyuki Sawada and Pan A. Yotopoulos
March 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-022
The Impact of Information Technology on Emergency
Health Care Outcomes
Susan Athey and Scott Stern
January 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-021
Getting To Work
Paul Milgrom
January 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-020
Package Bidding: Vickrey Vs Ascending Auctions
Paul Milgrom and Lawrence M. Ausubel
January 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-019
The Rise of German Protectionism in The 1870’s:
A Macroeconomic Perspective
Asaf Zussman
January 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-018
A Puzzle of Vertical Integration and Segmentation
In U.S. Long Distance Telephony
Nathan G. Goldstein
January 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-017
Predicting Currency Crises With a Nested Logit Model
Kit Ming Yan
July 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-016
The Economics of Promotion and Relegation in Sports Leagues: The Case of English Football
Roger G. Noll
January 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-015
The Economics of Baseball Contraction
Roger G. Noll
January 2002 Revised March 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-013
Resolving Policy Chaos in High Speed Internet Access
Roger G. Noll
January 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-014
Economic Fundamentals of the Knowledge Society
Paul A. David and Dominique Foray
December 2001 - Revised February 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-012
Heterogenous Forecasting and Federal Reserve Information
Mordecai Kurz
December 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-010
Not Invented Here: What Can be Learned From Elsewhere About Restructuring Electricity Markets
Robert Thomas Crow
December 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-009
Spectrum Allocation and the Internet
Bruce M. Owen and Gregory L. Rosston
December 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-008
The Long and Winding Road: The FCC Paves the Path with Good Intentions
Gregory L. Rosston
December 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-011
Endogenous Fluctuations and the Role of Monetary Policy
Mordecai Kurz
November 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-006
The Effect of Employer Recruitment Strategies on Job Placements and Match Quality
Jed DeVaro
November 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-007
Intergenerational Risk Sharing via Social Security when Financial Markets are Incomplete
Dirk Krueger and Felix Kubler
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-010
Standardization, Diversity, and Learning in China’s Nuclear Power Program
Geoffrey Rothwell
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-005
Two Centuries of American Macroeconomic Growth
From Exploitation of Resource Abundance to Knowledge-Driven Development
Moses Abramovitz and Paul A. David
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-004
The Beginnings and Prospective Ending of “End-to-End”
Paul A. David
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-051
Network Effects and Microsoft
Timothy F. Bresnahan
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-050
The Economics of the Microsoft Case
Timothy F. Bresnahan
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-049
The Right Remedy
Timothy F. Bresnahan
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-002
Firm Reputation with Hidden Information
Steven Tadelis
July 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-046
Clusters, Competition, and “Global Players” in ICT Markets: The Case of Scandinavia
John E. Richards
July 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-045
Learning the Silicon Valley Way
Gordon Moore and Kevin Davis
July 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-044
Taiwan’s Hsinchu Region: Imitator and Partner for Silicon Valley
AnnaLee Saxenian
June 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-043
“Old Economy” Inputs for “New Economy” Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New SiliconValley
Timothy Bresnahan, Alfonso Gambardella, AnnaLee Saxenian and Scott Wallsten
June 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-042
Agglomeration and Growth: A Study of the Cambridge Hi-Tech Cluster
Suma S. Athreye
June 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-041
In the Footsteps of Silicon Valley? Indian and Irish Software in the International Division of Labour
Ashish Arora , Alfonso Gambardella and Salvatore Torrisi
June 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-040
Israel’s Silicon Wadi: The Forces Behind Cluster Formation
Catherine de Fontenay and Erran Carmel
June 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-037
Ringing in the 20th Century: The Effects of State Monopolies, Private Ownership, and Operating Licenses on Telecommunications in Europe, 1892-1914
Scott Wallsten
June 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-034
Reforming the Taxation of Human Capital: A Modest Proposal
Paul A. David
June 2001 - Revised August 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-033
Will Building ‘Good Fences’ Really
Make ‘Good Neighbors’ in Science?
Paul A. David
April 2001
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-001
The Market for Reputations as an Incentive Mechanism
Steven Tadelis
March 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-039
The Role of Government in Regional Technology Development: The Effects of Public Venture Capital and Science Parks
Scott Wallsten
March 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-038
Growth in Industrial Clusters: A Bird’s Eye View of the United Kingdom
Catherine Beaudry and Peter Swann
March 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-031
The Surprising Retreat of Union Britain
John Pencavel
March 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 00-036
Is Disinflation Good for the Stock Market?
Peter Blair Henry
February 2001
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 00-035
Demand vs. Supply Driven Innovations:
US and Swedish Experiences in Academic
Entrepreneurship
Brent Goldfarb, Magnus Henrekson and Nathan Rosenberg
February 2001
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-032
Stock Market Liberalizations and the
Repricing of Systematic Risk
Anusha Chari and Peter Blair Henry
February 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-030
Voluntary Abatement and Market Value:
An Event Study Approach
Seema Arora
February 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-028
Expectations, Open Market Operations,
and Changes in the Federal Funds Rate
John B. Taylor
January 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-027
Relationship Capital and Competition In
the Corporate Securities Underwriting Market
Ayako Yasuda
January 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-025
A Purchasing Power Parity Paradox
Asaf Zussman
January 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-024
The Effect of Government Contracting On
Academic Research
Brent Goldfarb
January 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-023
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a 0.08%
BAC Limit and Other Policies Related to Drunk
Driving
Daniel Eisenberg
January 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-020
The Political Economy of International
Factor Mobility
Giovanni Facchini and Gerald Willmann
January 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-018
Energy, the Stock Market and the Putty-Clay
Investment Model
Chao Wei
December 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-017
The Effects of Social Security Reform on
Private Pensions
Andrew A. Samwick
December 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-016
Slow Boom, Big Crash
Laura L.Veldkamp
December 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-015
Quantifying Discrimination in Home Mortgage
Lending: Estimation of Loan Price Elasticities
Across Products and Races
Faye Steiner
December 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-026
Measuring Productivity Dynamics with Endogenous
Choice of Technology and Capacity Utilization:
An Application to Automobile Assembly
Johannes Van Biesebroeck
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-022
Labor Markets Under Endogenous Union Formation
Pablo Ruiz-Verdú
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-014
Indicative Bidding
Lixin Ye
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-013
Mechanism Choice and Strategic Bidding
in Divisible Good Auctions: An Empirical Analysis
Of the Turkish Treasury Auction Market
Ali Hortacsu
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-012
Generalized Solow-Neutral Technical Progress
and Postwar Economic Growth
Michael J. Boskin and Lawrence J. Lau
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-011
Stochastic Taxation and Asset Pricing In
Dynamic General Equilibrium
Clemens Sialm
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-010
Environmental Externalities and Consumer’s
Frames of Reference
Ronald Wendner
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-009
A Cohort Analysis of the Association Between
Work Hours and Wages Among Men
John Pencavel
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-007
The Impact of Public Basic Research on
Industrial Innovation: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical
Industry
Andrew Toole
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-005
Longevity-Insured Retirement Distributions
from Pension Plans: Market and Regulatory
Issues
Jeffrey R. Brown and Mark J. Warshawsky
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-021
From C to Shining C: Competition and Cross-Subsidy
in Communications
Gregory L. Rosston and Bradley S. Wimmer
October 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-019
Is There a Cost to Poor Institutions?
Davide Lombardo
October 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-006
Is Disinflation Good for Growth
Peter Blair Henry
October 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-004
The Peter Principle:Promotions and Declining
Productivity
Edward P. Lazeare
October 2000 (Revised) |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-003
Innovation in the Governance of Product-System
Innovation: The Silicon Valley Model
Masahiko Aoki
October 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-002
A Tragedy of the Public Knowledge 'Commons'?
Global Science, Intellectual Property and
The Digital Technology Boomerang
Paul A. David
October 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-029
The Future of United States Securities
Regulation in an Age of Technological Uncertainty
Joseph A. Grundfest
September 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-008
Asset Location for Retirement Savers
James M. Poterba, John B. Shoven, Clemens
Sialm
September 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-028
Intertemporal Choice and Consumption Mobility
Tullio Jappelli and Luigi Pistaferri
August 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-027
Superior Information, Income Shocks and
the Permanent Income Hypothesis
Luigi Pistaferri
August 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-029
Sources of U. S. Economic Growth in a World
of Ideas
Charles I. Jones
July 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-001
Measuring the Inflation of Parallel Currencies:
An Empirical Reevaluation Of the Second Hungarian
Hyperinflation
Beatrix Paal
June 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-032
Reforming Urban Water Systems in Developing
Countries
Roger G. Noll, Mary M. Shirley, Simon Cowan
June 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-031
Telecommunications Reform in Developing
Countries
Roger G. Noll
June 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-025
Why Incentive versus Transaction Costs:
A Theory of Procurement Contracts
Patrick Bajari and Steven Tadelis
June 2000 |
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-21
Telecommunications Privatization in
Developing Countries: The Real Effects of
Exclusivity Periods
Scott J. Wallsten
May 2000
The telecommunication sector around the
world has been undergoing dramatic reforms
since the 1980s. Developing countries have
been privatizing state-owned firms and slowly
introducing competition into the telecom
sector. We have a good theoretical understanding
of the effects of telecom privatization
and some empirical work is beginning to
emerge, as well. In general, privatization,
especially when combined with effective
regulatory institutions, improves telecom
service. However, we have almost no empirical
information on the real effects of the details
of the privatization transaction. In particular,
many countries grant the privatized telecom
firm a multi-year exclusivity period; that
is, the government allows the newly-privatized
firm to operate as a monopoly for some number
of years. The exclusivity period is typically
granted to increase the sale price of the
firm and thus government revenues. While
private investors are almost certainly willing
to pay more for firms that can earn monopoly
profits, a monopoly is less likely to improve
service than is a firm operating in a competitive
environment. As a result, the exclusivity
period may boost government revenues at
the cost of delaying improvements in telecom
services to the population. Largely because
data is scarce, to date no empirical studies
have attempted to systematically estimate
the effects of these exclusivity periods.
In this paper I use an original, new dataset
to explore the real effects of exclusivity
periods. The Infrastructure Privatization
Database is jointly sponsored by Stanford
University and The World Bank to analyze
the impact of regulatory institutions and
privatization policies on utility performance.
Using this combination of firm- and country-level
cross-section and panel data, I estimate
the effect of exclusivity periods on firms’
sale prices and also on sector performance
in terms of network penetration. The results
confirm conventional wisdom: exclusivity
periods significantly increase the sale
price of the firm, but substantially decrease
network growth.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-20
Should the Government Subsidize Supply
or Demand in the Market for Scientists and
Engineers?
Paul Romer
May 2000
This paper suggests that innovation policy
in the United States has erred by subsidizing
the private sector demand for scientists
and engineers without asking whether the
educational system provides the supply response
necessary for these subsidies to work. It
suggests that the existing institutional
arrangements in higher education limit this
supply response. To illustrate the path
not taken, the paper considers specific
programs that could increase the number
of scientists and engineers available to
the private sector.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-19
The Response of Employees to Severance
Incentives:
The University of California's Faculty,
1991-1994
John Pencavel
April 2000
In response to huge budgetary shortfalls
in the early 1990s, the University of California
offered its older and longer service employees
financial inducements to leave. This paper
analyzes the responses of UC's faculty to
three waves of buyout incentives. It is
estimated that an individual presented with
ten percent higher severance benefits has
a seven to eight percent higher probability
of quitting. However, quit probabilities
are very difficult to forecast with accuracy.
This casts doubt on arguments that maintain
that buyouts are superior to employer-initiated
layoffs as a mechanism to effect large employment
changes.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-18
The "State" of Universal Service
Gregory L. Rosston and Bradley S. Wimmer
April 2000
The introduction of competition forces
regulators to address the historical practice
of using of implicit cross subsidies to
maintain uniformly low local telephone service
rates. The Federal Communications Commission
recently adopted rules to remove a portion
of these implicit subsidies by adopting
an explicit universal service program. This
program, however, only addresses a small
portion of the problem and leaves to the
states problems associated with intrastate
cross subsidies. In this paper we examine
several alternative universal service programs
that states may adopt. Overall, we find
that universal service programs that base
subsidy dollars on the cost of providing
service have little effect on telephone
penetration rates and result in large taxes,
which distort market outcomes and drive
those paying into the system from the network.
Large universal service programs also cause
competitive distortions. Furthermore, we
find that cost-based mechanisms do an equally
poor job when we use normative criteria,
such as the effect the programs have on
the distribution of income.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-030
Was an Industrial Revolution Inevitable?
Economic Growth Over the Very Long Run
Charles I. Jones
March 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-024
Why Do Blacks Live in The Cities and Whites
Live in the Suburbs?
Patrick Bajari and Matthwe E. Kahn
Revised March 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-023
Winner Curse, Reserve Prices and Endogenous
Entry: Empirical Insights from eBay Auctions
Patrick Bajari and Ali Hortacsu
March 2000 |
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-17
Executive Compensation and Firm Performance:
Big Carrot, Small Stick
Scott J. Wallesten
March 2000
The statistical link between executive
compensation and firm performance is well
established. I explore two features of the
relationship that have not yet been addressed
empirically. First, does the relationship
itself change depending on firm performance?
I find that, on average, executives are
rewarded in good years but are not punished
in bad years. This result is consistent
with a model that attempts to induce risk-taking
behavior by rewarding good performance and
limiting downside punishment. Second, does
the relationship change with the executive’s
rank in the company? I find that the top
executive’s compensation is most strongly
linked with performance, the second-highest
ranking executive less so, and the third-highest
even less. This result is consistent with
linking compensation to performance only
to the extent that the employee has some
direct influence on it.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-026
Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts
Of CO2 Abatement Policies: What Does It Cost?
A. Lars Bovenberg and Laurence Goulder
February 2000 |
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-016
The Dow Jones Average: The Impact of
Fixing Its Flaws
John B. Shoven and Clemens Sialm
February 2000
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a flawed
index. The index uses price weights instead
of conceptually superior market valuation
weights, the companies included in the index
are not chosen systematically and are not
very representative of the U.S. market,
and the index ignores returns from dividends.
This paper shows that alternative stock
price indices which use superior weighting
methods and a more systematic inclusion
criterion perform very similarly to the
Dow Jones Industrial Average. However, ignoring
dividends underestimates the long-run returns
earned by stock market investors dramatically.
If Dow Jones & Co. had included dividend
returns in the DJIA when it was reformed
in 1928, the index would be over 250,000
today.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-15
Economic Measurement: Progress and Challenges
Michael J. Boskin
January 2000
The development of the concepts and measurements
of national income are among the most important
achievements of modern economics. However,
substantial improvements can and should
be made in the traditional domain of the
national accounts. The Commerce Departments
Bureau of Economic Analysis has made numerous
improvements in recent years, including
changing the focus from gross national product
(GNP) to gross domestic product (GDP), chain
weighting, using technically improved (Fisher
Ideal) price and output indexes, adopting
the system of national accounts (SNA) and
initiating work on a variety of satellite
accounts. In the postwar period, BEA has
responded to the large structural changes
in the economy, and the need for greater
detail and frequency of estimates. Additional
work should be done to improve measurement
in a number of areas: the growth of hard-to-measure
services, new products, quality improvements,
technology and innovation, time use, international
trade and capital flows, the impact of new
firms, financial innovations, changes in
the organization of production and distribution,
capital accounts and demography, to name
a few of the most important.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-13
Asset Allocation and Risk Allocation:
Can Social Security Improve its Future Solvency
Problem by Investing in Private Securities?
Thomas E. MaCurdy
January 2000
This paper examines the economics of investing
the central trust fund of Social Security
in private securities. We note that switching
from a policy of having the trust fund invest
solely in special issue Treasury bonds to
one where some of the portfolio holds common
stocks amounts to an asset swap. Such an
asset swap does not increase national saving,
wealth or GDP. We also show that it is far
from a sure thing in terms of improving
the finances of the Social Security system.
The asset swap is deemed successful if the
stock portfolio generates sufficient cash
to pay off the interest and principal of
the bonds and still have money left over.
It is deemed a failure otherwise. By using
historical data and a bootstrap statistical
technique, we estimate that the exchange
of ten or twenty year bonds for a stock
portfolio would worsen social securitys
finances roughly twenty to twenty-five percent
of the time. Further, failures are autocorrelated
meaning that if the strategy fails one year
it is extremely likely to fail the next.
Such high failure rates imply that the defined
benefit structure of benefits becomes less
credible with stocks in the trust fund.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-11
Understanding Digital Technology's Evolution
and The Path of Measured Productivity Growth:
Present and Future in the Mirror of the
Past
Paul A. David
January 2000
Three styles of explanation
have been advanced by economists seeking
to account for the so-called "productivity
paradox". The coincidence of a persisting
slowdown in the growth of measured total
factor productivity (TFP) in the US, since
the mid-1970's, with the wave of information
technology (It) innovations, is said by
some to be an illusion due to the mismeasurement
of real output growth; by others to expose
the mistaken expectations about the benefits
of computerization; and by still others
to reflect the amount of time, and the volume
of intangible investments in "learning",
and the time required for ancillary innovations
that allow the new digital technologies
to be applied in ways that are reflected
in measured productivity growth. This paper
shows that rather than viewing these as
competing hypotheses, the dynamics of the
transition to a new technological and economic
regime based upon a general purpose technology
(GPT) should be understood to be likely
to give rise to all three "effects." It
more fully articulates and supports this
thesis, which was first advanced in the
"computer and dynamo" papers by David (1990,
1991). The relevance of that historical
experience is re-asserted and supported
by further evidence rebutting skeptics who
have argued that the diffusion of electrification
and computerization have little in common.
New evidence is produced
about the links between IT use, mass customization,
and the upward bias of output price deflators
arising from the method used to "chain in"
new products prices. The measurement bias
due to the exclusion of intangible investments
from the scope of the official national
product accounts also is examined. Further,
it is argued that the development of the
general-purpose PC delayed the re-organization
of businesses along lines that would have
more directly raised task productivity,
even though the technologies yielded positive
"revenue productivity" gains for large companies.
The paper concludes by indicating the emerging
technical and organizational developments
that are likely to deliver a sustained surge
of measured TFP growth during the decades
that lie immediately ahead.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-9
Tax Externalities of Equity Mutual Funds
Joel M. Dickson, John B. Shoven, and Clemens
Sialm
December 1999
Investors holding mutual funds in taxable
accounts face a classic externality. The
after-tax return of their investment depends
on the behavior of others. In particular,
redemptions may force the mutual fund to
sell some of its equity positions in order
to pay off the liquidating investors. As
a result, the mutual fund may be forced
to distribute realized capital gains to
its shareholders. The taxes of investors
staying with the fund are accelerated by
the actions of those leaving the fund. On
the other hand, new investors convey a positive
externality upon existing investors by diluting
the unrealized capital gain position of
the fund. The simulations presented in this
paper show that these externalities are
important determinants of the after-tax
performance of equity mutual funds. Mutual
fund managers can significantly influence
the magnitude of these externalities by
choosing tax-efficient accounting techniques
and investment policies.
The authors would like to thank Olivia
Lau of Stanford for superb assistance with
this research. We also have benefited from
discussions, information and ideas from
Fred Grauer, Keith Lawson, Davide Lombardo,
Jim Poterba, John Rea, Douglas Shackelford,
and conference participants at the NBERÕs
"The Economic Effects of Taxation." Research
support from the Smith-Richardson Foundation
and the NBER are gratefully acknowledged.
The opinions expressed in this paper are
those of the authors and do not necessarily
reflect the views of The Vanguard Group
Inc., its affiliates, or its Board of Directors.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-8
Winners and Losers from the Universal
Service Subsidy Battle
Bradley S. Wimmer and Gregory L. Rosston
December 1999
The FCC recently adopted a new universal
service plan to comply with the mandates
of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and
the introduction of competition that make
implicit cross-subsidy no longer viable.
The new universal service plan uses a detailed
forward-looking cost model to estimate the
cost of providing service for each of 12,493
wire centers across the country. Based on
the model, the Commission will provide new
universal service funding to 7 states. If
states adopt a similar plan to fund high
cost areas, it will cost about $1.7 billion
more per year than a targeted subsidy to
low-income households.
Combining the results of the universal
service cost model with U.S. Census demographic
data allows analysis of what different groups
receive universal service subsidy if the
states adopt similar plans. Less than 20
percent of households with incomes under
$20,000 per year would receive any subsidy
dollars the other 80 percent of these
low-income households would pay into the
system. At the same time, many high income
households would receive support. As expected,
Blacks, Hispanics and Asians are less likely
than Whites and Native Americans to receive
high cost support because they tend to live
in more urban areas.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.99-5
Currency Substitution, Speculation, and
Financial Crises: Theory and Empirical Analysis
Yasuyuki Sawada and Pan A. Yotopoulos
November 1999
We extend the "fundamentals model" of currency
crisis by incorporating the currency substitution
effects explicitly. In a regime of free
foreign exchange markets and free capital
movements the reserve (hard) currencies
are likely to substitute for the local soft
currency in agents' portfolia that include
currency as an asset. Our model shows that,
controlling for the fundamentals of an economy,
the more pronounced the currency substitution
is in a country, the earlier and the stronger
is the tendency for the local currency to
devalue. This is especially true if indebtedness,
public and private, fail to decrease as
currency substitution occurs. Moreover,
the use of the required reserve ratio is
indicated as an adjustment device to moderate
short-term capital inflows and control the
level of indebtedness.
The model is implemented by constructing
a currency-softness index. Two empirical
findings emerge. First, there is a negative
relationship between the currency-softness
index and the degree of nominal exchange
rate devaluation. This indicates that soft
currency countries have a systematic tendency
to have under-valued currency. Second, there
is a systematic negative relationship between
the softness of a currency and the level
of economic development. The policy recommendations
of the paper refer to the means of achieving
"moderately repressed exchange rates," and
thus helping diffuse the pressure for devaluation
of soft currencies that is exogenously determined
through the opportunities afforded for currency
substitution in a globalization environment.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.99-4
Free Currency Markets, Financial Crises
and the Growth Debacle: Is There a Causal
Relationship?
Pan A. Yotopoulos and Yasuyuki Sawada
November 1999
The paper develops an alternative hypothesis
that attributes collateral responsibility
for the recent spate of financial crises
to a basic flaw of the architecture of the
international financial system, free markets
for foreign exchange. A valid positional
distinction between reserve/ hard and soft
currencies, based on reputation, accounts
for the systematic substitution of the former
currencies for a country's soft currency
in liquid asset holdings. The result of
this "asymmetric reputation" in an environment
of free currency markets is the systematic
devaluation of soft currencies. Moreover,
bubbles, devaluations and financial crises,
far from being self-correcting monetary
phenomena, can lead to sharp contractions
in the economy through the misallocation
of resources in competitive devaluation
trade, as opposed to comparative advantage
trade. In a case that is parallel to asymmetric
information and incomplete credit markets,
the appropriate policy intervention in asymmetric-reputation
driven incomplete currency markets is maintaining
mildly repressed exchange rates. The operational
definition of "mild" is imposing restrictions
on currency substitution, whether it is
home-grown or it is the result of foreign
financial capital taking short positions
on the local currency.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-014
The Vickrey Lecture: From Edgeworth to
Vickrey To Mirrlees
Michael J. Boskin
October 1999
William Vickrey's Agenda for Progressive
Taxation is perhaps his best-known work.
It stands roughly half way between Edgeworth
and Mirrlees, both historically and intellectually.
Edgeworth argued that the optimal tax (and
transfer) system equalized incomes by taxing
above-average incomes at 100 percent and
transferring the proceeds to those below
average. Mirrlees argued optimality in the
presence of disincentive effects, which
Edgeworth ignored, placing severe limits
on high tax rates. Vickrey proposed 21 tax
reforms to make a practical system of personal
progressive taxation workable. The two most
famous were cumulative lifetime averaging
and decreasing power succession taxes. This
paper reviews the proposals in light of
subsequent intellectual and historical developments.
Many of the issues Vickrey explored are
relevant today whether the tax system is
flat or progressive and whether the base
is income or consumption.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-10
The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection:
Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading
AnnaLee Saxenian
September 1999
Silicon Valley in California and the Hsinchu-Taipei
region of Taiwan are among the most frequently
cited 'miracles' of the information technology
era. The dominant accounts of these successes
treat them in isolation, focusing either
on free markets, multinationals or the state.
This paper argues that the dynamism of these
regional economies is attributable to their
increasing interdependencies. A community
of US-educated Taiwanese engineers has coordinated
a decentralized process of reciprocal industrial
upgrading by transferring capital, skill,
and know-how and by facilitating collaborations
between specialist producers in the two
regions. This case underscores the significance
of technical communities and their institutions
in diffusing ideas and organizing production
at the global as well as the local level.
Download this paper
(PDF) | Data
from this paper (PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.99-1
Is Public R&D a Complement of Substitute
for Private R&D? A Review of the Economic
Evidence
Paul A. David, Bronwyn H. Hall, and
Andrew A. Tool
September 1999
Is public R&D spending complementary and
thus “additional” to private R&D spending,
or does it substitute for and tend to “crowd
out” private R&D? Conflicting answers are
given to this question. We survey the body
of available econometric evidence accumulated
over the past 35 years. A framework for
analysis of the problem is developed to
help organize and summarize the findings
of econometric studies based on time series
and cross-section data from various levels
of aggregation (laboratory, firm, industry,
country). The findings overall are ambivalent
and the existing literature as a whole is
subject to the criticism that the nature
of the “experiment(s)” that the investigators
envisage is not adequately specified. We
conclude by offering suggestions for improving
future empirical research on this issue.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-22
Bequests as Signals: An Explanation
for the Equal Division Puzzle
B. Douglas Bernheim and Sergei Sererinov
August 1999
In the United States, more than two-thirds
of decedents with multichild families divide
their estates exactly equally among their
children. In contrast, intra vivos gifts
are usually unequal. These findings challenge
the validity of existing theories regarding
the determination of intergenerational transfers.
In this paper, we develop a theory that
accounts for this puzzle, based on the notion
that the division of bequests provides a
signal about a parent’s altruistic preferences.
The theory can also explain the norm of
unigeniture, which prevails in other societies.
(JEL D10, H31)
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.99-3 (see Paper No. 01-005 for expanded version
American Macroeconomic Growth in the
Era of Knowledge-Based Progress: The Long-Run
Perspective
Moses Abramovitz and Paul A. David
August 1999
This chapter focuses on the nature of the
macroeconomic growth process that has characterized
the United States experience, and manifested
itself in the changing pace sources of the
rise real output per capita in U.S. economy
during the past two hundred years. Our main
interest is indeed, the twentieth century,
but we believe that its major characteristics
and the nature of the underlying forces
at work are clearly seen in comparisons
between the century just past and the one
that came before.
A key observation that emerges from the
long-term quantitative economic record is
that the proximate sources of increases
in real gross domestic product per capita
in the century between 1889 and 1989 were
quite different from those which obtained
during the first one hundred years of American
national experience. Baldly put, the national
economy moved from margin has become more
and more dependent upon the acquisition
and exploitation of technological and organizational
knowledge.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-12
The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement
of Law
A. Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell
July 1999
Public enforcement of law -- the use of
public agents (inspectors, tax auditors,
police, prosecutors) to detect and to sanction
violators of legal rules -- is a subject
of obvious generate, the extent of compliance
with the income tax code, and the incidence
of theft, robbery and other crimes.
The earliest economically-oriented writing
in the subject of law enforcement dates
from the eighteenth century contributions
of Montesquieu (1748), Cesare Beccaria (1767),
and, especially Jeremy Bentham (1789), whose
analysis of deterrence was sophisticated
and economic scholarship until the late
1960s, when Gary S. Becker 1968 published
a highly influential article. Since then,
well over two hundred articles have been
written on the economics of enforcement.
The main purpose of our article is to present
the economic theory public enforcement of
law in a systematic and comprehensive way.
The theoretical core of our analysis (section
2 through 4) answers the following basic
questions: How much of society's resources
should be devoted to apprehending injuries?
If an injurer is caught, should the rule
of liability be strict or fault-based? Should
the form of the sanction be a fine, an imprisonment
term, or a combination of the two? At what
level should sanctions be set?
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-7
Local and Global Competition in Information
Technology
Timothy Bresnahan and John Richards
June 1999
We examine the implications of changing
competitive dynamics in global information
and communications technology (ICT) markets
for government demand-steering policies
whose goal is local rents. Both computing
and telephony are undergoing changes in
global industry structure and changes in
the nature of competition. The convergence
of computing and telephony and the rapid
technological change (and accompanying technological
uncertainty) driving this convergence reinforce
trends toward vertical competition. The
emergence of global ICT markets lowers entry
barriers, likely encouraging government-
supported local entrants into global ICT
markets. There are, however, strongly offsetting
disadvantages. The underlying economics
of ICT markets under vertical competition
will work to reinforce the dominant position
of U.S.-based incumbents in many segments.
The prospects for exports, command of rent-related
standards, and large rents from exports
are not very bright. We expect to see far
more demand-steering attempts than successes.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.98-6
"The Contribution of Public Science to
Industrial Innovation: An Application to
the Pharmaceutical Industry"
Andrew A. Toole
June 1999
This paper has been revised and is now
listed as SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 00-007
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
98-4
The ABC's of Universal Service: Arbitrage,
Big Bucks and Competition
Gregory L. Rosston and Bradley S. Wimmer
April 1999
The introduction of competition requires
a re-thinking of policies. Current proposals
for a new universal service, however, contain
many problems that create artificial incentives
that will cause firms to waste money and
do not necessarily reward firms that best
serve customers. The problems are inherent
in the methods to collect taxes to fund
the universal service programs and the manner
in which universal service funds will be
disbursed. The majority of these problems
stem from attempts to create artificial
regulatory and jurisdictional distinctions
and will only disappear when regulators
and politicians realize the efficiency and
consumers are better served in a competitive
environment by an economically rational
system of transparent subsidies rather than
the web of implicit cross subsidies. In
this paper, we examine the sources for these
inefficient distortions and propose changes
to the current and proposed programs that
will better achieve a goal of universal
service with a minimum of distortion in
the marketplace. Distortions arise from
arbitrary categorizations of services. For
example, services are labeled "interstate"
or "intrastate." Because each jurisdiction
imposes its own taxes, firms have an incentive
to reconfigure their service offerings simply
to minimize taxation. Both tax rates and
distribution mechanisms create incentives
for wasteful arbitrage. There are two ways
to cure the problem: to prevent arbitrage
through regulation or to reduce the incentive
for arbitrage by minimizing the level of
taxes. We argue that the second solution
will be much better for communications competition
and universal service.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
98-3
Early Twenthieth Century Productivity
Growth Dynamics: An Inquiry into the Economic
History of "Our Ignorance"
Paul A. David and Gavin Wright
March 1999-Revised April 1999
A marked acceleration of total factor productivity
(TFP) growth in U.S. manufacturing followed
World War I. This development contributed
substantially to the absolute and relative
rise of the domestic economy's aggregate
TFP residual, which is observed when the
"growth accounts" for the first quarter
of the twentieth century are compared with
those for the second half of the nineteenth
century. Two visions of the dynamics of
productivity growth are germane to an understanding
of these developments. One emphasizes the
role of forces affecting broad sections
of the economy, through spillovers of knowledge
and the diffusion of general purpose technologies
(GPT's). The second view considers that
possible sources of productivity increase
are multiple and idiosyncratic. Setting
aside possible measurement errors, the latter
approach regards sectoral and economy-wide
surges of the TFP growth to be simply the
result of which carried more weight than
others. Although there is room for both
views in an analysis of the sources of the
industrial TFP acceleration during the 1920's,
we find the evidence more compelling in
support of the first approach. The proximate
source of the TFP surge lay in the switch
from declining or stable capital productivity
to a rising output-capital ratio, which
occurred at this time in many branches of
manufacturing, and which was not accompanied
by slowed growth in labor productivity.
The 1920's saw critical advances in the
electrification industry, the diffusion
of a GTP that brought significant fixed
capital-savings. But the same era also witnessed
profound transformations in the American
industrial labor market, followed the stoppage
of mass immigration from Europe; rising
real wages provided strong impetus to changes
in workforce recruitment and management
practices that were underway in some branches
of the economy before the War. The productivity
surge reflected the confluence of these
two forces. This historical study has direct
relevance for policies intended to increase
the rate of productivity growth. In many
respects, the decade of the 1920's launched
the US economy on a high-growth path that
lasted until the 1970's. If we hope to return
to the growth performance of that era, we
would be well advised to understand how
it began.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
98-1
Taxation and Saving
B. Douglas Bernheim
March 1999
In this survey, I summarize and evaluate
the extant literature concerning taxation
and personal saving. I describe the theoretical
models that economists have used to depict
savings decisions and I explore the positive
and normative implications of these models.
The central positive question is whether
and to what extent specific public policies
raise or lower the rate of saving. The central
normative question is whether and to what
extent it is desirable to tax the economic
returns to saving. I also examine empirical
evidence on the saving effects of various
tax policies. This evidence includes econometric
studies of the generic relation between
saving and the after-rate tax of return,
as well as the analyses of responses to
the economic incentives that are imbedded
in tax-deferred retirement accounts. Finally,
I also discuss several indirect channels
through which tax policy may affect household
saving by altering the behavior of third
parties, such as employers.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
98-2
An Insider's View of FCC Spectrum Auctions
Evan R. Kwerel and Gregory L. Rosston
February 1999
After a long period of awarding spectrum
licenses inefficiently, changes in the budget
and budgetary process coupled with increases
in the value of the spectrum for non-broadcast
use led Congress to allow the Federal Communications
Commission to award licenses through competitive
bidding. Contrary to the perceived view
of government bureaucracies as excessively
cautious, the FCC used the newfound authority
to adopt a novel approach to auction design-simultaneous
multiple round auctions. The innovative
auction design would not have been adopted
without the successful collaboration between
government economists and academic economists,
who helped to formulate and refine the design
so that decision makers at the FCC could
be convinced that the novel technique was
both superior and practical. The FCC's implementation
of competitive bidding was not only rapid
as mandated by Congress, but also much less
costly than outside alternatives and allowed
the integration of spectrum policy decisions
and auction design. Experience from several
auctions has led to a number of open questions
and refinements. The FCC is trying to replicate
the success with the original auction design
by facilitating dialog between the agency
and outside auction experts in order to
address these issues. The lessons from the
auctions process should guide policy makers
as they propose and implement future programs.
Development of a constituency is necessary
even for the efficiency enhancing programs.
Once a program is in place, collaboration
between government and leading academics
can push these programs to further increase
the public interest and withstand criticism
normally leveled at government agencies.
In addition, continued flexibility and willingness
to re-examine a program is possible depending
on the intrenched interests.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
98-5
Information Technology, Workplace Organization
and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-level
Evidence
Timothy F. Brsnahan, Erik Brynjolfsson
and Lorin M. Hitt
February 1999
Recently, the relative demand for skilled
labor has increased dramatically. We investigate
one of the causes, skilled-biased technical
change. Advances in information technology
(IT) are among the most powerful forces
bearing on the economy. Employers who use
IT often make complementary innovations
in their organizations and in the services
they offer. Our hypothesis is that these
co-inventions by IT users change the mix
of skills that employers demand. Specifically,
we test the hypothesis that is a cluster
of complementary changes involving IT, workplace
organization and services that is the key
skill-biased technical change. We examine
new firm-level data liking several indicators
of IT use, workplace organization, and the
demand for skilled labor. In both a short-run
factor demand framework and a production
function framework, we find evidence for
complementarity. IT use is complementary
to a new workplace organization which includes
broader job responsibilities for line workers,
more decentralized decision-making and more
self-managing teams. In turn, both IT and
that new organization are complements with
worker skill, measured in a variety of ways.
Further, the managers in our survey believe
that IT increases skill requirements and
autonomy among workers in their firms. Taken
together, the results highlight the roles
of both IT and Itenabled organizational
change as important components of the skill-biased
technical change.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.99-2
Adjusting to a New Technology: Experience
and Training
Elhanan Helpman and Antonio Rangel
January 1998 Revised: December 1998
How does the economy react to the arrival
of a new major technology? The existing
literature on General Purpose Technologies
(GPTs) has studied the role that mechanisms
like secondary innovations, diffusion, and
learning by firms play in the adjustment
process. By contrast, we focus on a new
mechanism based on the interplay between
technological change and human capital accumulation.
We show that technological change that requires
more education and training, like computerization,
necessarily produces an initial slowdown.
Surprisingly, however, technological change
that lowers the training requirement, like
the mover from the artisan shop to the factory,
can produce either a bust or a boom. We
identify three key properties that determine
which effect will occur: 1) the productivity
of inexperienced workers; 2) the speed with
which experience increases productivity;
and 3) the level of general skills required
to operate the new technology.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-6
The Appropriate Design of Collective
Bargaining Systems: Learning from the Experience
of Britain, Australia, and New Zealand
John Pencavel
November 1998
The experiences of three countries --
Britain, Australia, and New Zealand -- are
drawn upon to suggest how the legal framework
for collective bargaining ought to be designed
to bring forth unionism's most desirable
features. For most of the twentieth century,
these three countries have adopted quite
different regulatory postures: Australia
and New Zealand (until recently) intervened
extensively into the procedures for wage
determination and set up compulsory arbitration
tribunals to underpin wages; by contrast,
Britain's support of collective bargaining
was indirect. In all cases, however, this
regulation of collective bargaining complemented
other economic policies that contributed
to inferior economic performance, something
that has now been recognized in New Zealand
and Britain by reforms that have taken place
during the past two decades. The lessons
for economic policy are that superior macro-economic
performance is easier to attain when collective
bargaining is regulated not by an assortment
of mandates and constraints set down in
legal code, but by allowing managements
and workers to design bargaining protocols
that suit them and by promoting competition
in product and factor markets. In specifying
the framework of collective bargaining,
the state should not be partisan and should
encourage the resolution of disputes at
the level of the firm or place of work.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
499
Wages, Skills and Technology in the United
States and Canada
Kevin M. Murphy, W. Craig Riddell and
Paul Romer
August 1998
Wages for more and less educated workers
have followed strikingly different paths
in the US and Canada. During the 1980s and
1990s, the ratio of the earnings of university
graduates to high school graduates increased
sharply in the US but fell slightly in Canada.
Katz and Murphy (1992) found that for the
US, a simple supply-demand model fit the
pattern of variation in the premium over
time. We find that the same model and parameter
estimates explain the variation between
the US and Canada. In both instances, the
relative demand for more educated labor
shifts out at the same, consistent rate.
Both over time and between countries, the
variation in rate of growth of relative
wages can be explained by variation in the
relative supply of more educated workers.
Many economists suspect that technological
change is causing the steady increases in
the relative demand for more educated labor.
If so, these data provide independent evidence
on the spatial and temporal variation in
the pattern of technological change. Whatever
is causing this increased demand for skill,
the evidence from Canada suggested that
increases in educational attainment and
skills can reduce the rate at which relative
wages diverge.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
495
Competition Policy in European Sports
after the Bosman Case
Roger G. Noll
June 1998
In the Bosman decision, the European Court
of Justice declared that the rules of international
football (soccer) governing the player market
violated the Maastricht Treaty by preventing
international competition for professional
athletes. The purpose of this paper is to
extend the logic of the Bosman decision
to other governance rules of European football,
including policies regarding broadcasting,
product licensing, and creating and expanding
professional leagues. The essence of the
argument is that growth in demand for sports
and the conversion of European television
from nationalized monopoly to privatized
competition has vastly increased the financial
incentive to create international football
leagues comprised of the best teams from
the existing national premier leagues. Thus
far, national and international football
organizations have resisted this movement,
but they are unlikely to be successful in
doing so. Hence, the relevant question is
to identify the various ways these international
leagues can be structured, and to apply
the principles of competition policy analysis
to evaluate them. The main conclusions are
that the European Union should, if possible,
promote multiple competing leagues rather
than a single, monopoly league, or if this
is not feasible, to prevent the single league
from monopolizing the sale of broadcasting
and licensing rights and the number or premier
league teams that will be permitted.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
494
Reducing the Communication Gap Between
Economists and Policy Makers: A Set
of Structural Policy Indicators
Jan-Erik Stostad
April 1998
Economists have come to view indicators
like the budget deficit and the inflation
rate as necessary tools when discussing
stabilization policy. In dealing with structural
policy, however, indicators have a clearly
less prominent role. The paper argues that
constructing a standardized set of structural
indicators for the Norwegian economy, based
on economic theory, is likely to strengthen
structural policy surveillance and improve
the quality of public debate on efficiency
and growth issues. A simple "Market Failure
Approach" is presented to help identify
interesting indicators.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 498
A Historical Analysis of Monetary Policy
Rules
John B. Taylor
March 1998
This paper examines several episodes in
U.S. monetary history using the framework
of an interest rate rule for monetary policy.
The main finding is that a monetary policy
rule in which the interest rate responds
to inflation and real output more aggressively
than it did in the 1960s and 1970s, or than
during the time of the international gold
standard, and more like the late 1980s and
1990s, is a good policy rule. Moreover,
if one defines "policy mistakes" as deviations
from such a good policy rule, then such
mistakes have been associated with either
high and prolonged inflation or drawn out
periods of low capacity utilization.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
493
The Location and Allocation of Assets
in Pension and Conventional Savings
Accounts
John B. Shoven
March 1998
This paper examines the problem of optimal
asset location policy for pension and non-pension
retirement saving. If someone wants to save
more than they are permitted to put into
a tax-deferred pension account, then the
question is which asset class (stocks or
bonds) should be held in the pension and
which should be held outside in conventional
accounts. The standard answer - give any
corporate bonds in the portfolio a preferred
position in the pension - is shown, in general,
to be incorrect. For most households and
for most equity mutual funds, the optimal
location strategy is to give first priority
to holding the stock fund inside the pension.
Bonds would have a lower locational priority
and might have to be held outside the pension
in the form of municipals. The paper also
examines the optimal total retirement portfolio
asset allocation between stocks and bonds
for risk averse retirement savers. A policy
of 60 percent stocks and 40 percent bonds
is shown to be attractive for even extremely
risk averse investors.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
497
Do Stock Market Liberalizations Cause
Investment Booms?
Peter Blair Henry
November 1997
Stock market liberalization has a strong
positive effect on investment. I document
this result for a cross section of emerging
markets and show that the relationship holds
even when controlling for economic reforms
and changes in other fundamental values.
There are three principal components to
this finding. First, in each of the two
years immediately following liberalization,
the growth rate of private investment is
10 and 13 percentage points greater than
the sample mean respectively. Second, increases
in stock market valuation that are caused
by liberalization predict larger subsequent
increases in the growth rate of investment
than generic valuation increases. Finally,
in addition to the investment surge it causes
by driving up stock prices, liberalization
also increases investment through a channel
that operates independently of the liberalization-induced
increase in valuation. After controlling
for stock returns, investment is still 12
percent points higher than the sample mean
in the second year after liberalization.
The analysis is a natural experiment of
the kind proposed by Fisher and Merton (1984)
and suggests that stock market liberalization
provides a valuable impetus to the economic
reform process.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
492
Communications Policy in the Era of Choice
and Convergence with Reflections
on the Markle Foundation
Roger G. Noll and Monroe E. Price
October 1997
In the 1960s, technological progress caused
the technologies of communications media
to begin to converge. Convergence enhanced
the prospects for competition in the media,
promising consumers more choices - but only
if histroically anticompetive policies could
be reversed. As the era of convergence with
choice was dawning, Lloyd Morrisett became
the President of the John and Mary Markle
Foundation, and immediately changed the
focus of the Foundation's program from medical
reserach to communications policy. This
essay traces both the history of technology
and policy in communications, and the closely
related activities of the foundation, during
the Morrisett presidency, from September
1969 to December 1997. As such, the essay
provides both an intellectual history of
policy research in communications and a
chronicle of how a relatively small but
well-managed foundation can have a major
impact in an important area of public policy.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
491
What Accounts for the Variation in Retirement
Wealth among U.S. Households?
B. Douglas Bernheim, Jonathan Skinner, Steven
Weinberg
September 1997
Household survey data consistently depict
large variations in saving and wealth, even
among households with similar socio-economic
characteristics. Within the context of the
life cycle hypothesis, families with identical
lifetime resources might choose to accumulate
different levels of wealth for a variety
of reasons, including variation in time
preference rates, risk tolerance, exposure
to uncertainty, relative tastes for work
and leisure at advanced ages, income replacement
rates, and so forth. These factors can be
divided into a small number of classes,
each with a distinctive implication concerning
the relation between accumulated wealth
and the shape of the consumption profile.
By examining this relation empirically,
one can test for the presence or absence
of these particular explanations for differences
in wealth. Using the Panel Study of Income
Dynamics and the Consumer Expenditure Survey,
we find very little support for life cycle
models that rely on the above factors to
explain wealth variation. The data are,
however, consistent with "rule of thumb"
or "mental accounting" theories of wealth
accumulation.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 496
Stock Market Liberalization, Economic
Reform, and Emerging Market Equity Prices
Peter Blair Henry
September 1997
The decade from 1984 to 1994 witnessed
unprecedented emerging stock market liberalizations,
as governments from Caracas to Kuala Lumpur
opened their equity markets to non-residents
for the first time. Emerging market stock
prices also boomed during this period. It
is tempting to conclude that the stock market
openings were responsible for the jump in
asset prices, but the wave of openings was
concurrent with a period of drastic economic
reform. What then, caused the boom? Was
it external opening, reform, or both? By
constructing an exhaustive list of all major
stock market liberalizations and economic
reforms occurring in twelve LDCs from 1984
to 1994, I am able to disentangle the effects
of stock market opening from the influence
of economic reform. The results are striking.
The effects of stock market liberalization
are at most two thirds as large as suggested
by previous work, and economic reforms are
an equally important source of asset revaluation.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
490
Education and Saving: The Long-Term Effects
of High School Financial Curriculum Mandates
B. Douglas Bernheim, Daniel M. Garrett,
Dean M. Maki
June 1997
Over the last forty years, the majority
of states have adopted consumer education
policies, and a sizable minority have specifically
mandated that high school students receive
instruction on topics related to household
financial decision-making (budgeting, credit
management, saving and investment, and so
forth). In this paper, we attempt to determine
whether the curricula arising from these
mandates have had any discernable effect
on adult decisions regarding saving. Using
a unique household survey, we exploit the
variation in requirements both across states
and over time to identify the effects of
interest. The evidence indicates that mandates
have significantly raised both exposure
to financial curricula and subsequent asset
accumulation once exposed students reached
adulthood. These effects appear to have
been gradual rather than immediate--a probable
reflection of implementation lags.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
487
The Syndrome of the Ever-Higher Yen,
1971-95: American Mercantile Pressure on
Japanese Monetary Policy
Ronald McKinnon, Kenichi Ohno, Kazuko Shirono
May 1997
From August 1971 through to April 1995,
the yen ratcheted up against the dollar
because of mercantile pressure from the
United States, which was anxious to dampen
its eroding market shares in manufacturing
and burgeoning trade deficits. While temporarily
ameliorating political tensions arising
out of innumerable Japan-U.S. trade disputes,
these great yen appreciations imposed relative
deflation on Japan without correcting the
trade imbalance between the two countries.
Although resisting sharp yen appreciations
in the short run, the Bank of Japan validated
this syndrome of ever-higher yen by following
a dependent monetary policy that was deflationary
relative to that independently established
by the U.S. Federal Reserve System. The
appreciating yen was a forcing variable
in determining the Japanese price level.
After 1985, this resulted in great macroeconomic
instability in Japan including endaka fukyo
(high-yen-induced recessions) in 1986-87
and more severely in 1992-95. These recessions
further curtailed Japan's imports, thus
widening her trade surplus, and so further
aggravated American mercantilists.
This unfortunate cycle was (temporarily?)
suspended in the summer of 1995 only after
authorities in the U.S. Treasury finally
recognized that the Japanese macro-financial
system was on the verge of collapse. In
addition to suspending trade hostilities,
the American and Japanese governments collaborated
to drive the yen back down by almost 50
percent form its April peak. This permitted
the modest recovery of the Japanese economy
in 1996-97. But whether the syndrome of
the ever-higher yen is over, or is simply
in remission, remains to be seen.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
488
Relational Financing as an Institution
and its Viability under Competition
Masahiko Aoki, Serdar Dinc
May 1997
This paper presents a new, generic definition
of relational financing that may cover a
wide range of financial practices in different
economies, ranging from the Japanese main
bank relationship, to bank lending to smaller
firms, and venture capital in the U.S. It
then discusses various incentives of the
financier to commit to relational financing
and reviews the recent literature on issues
about how those incentives are affected
by increasing competition. One useful insight
is that increasing competition is not necessarily
harmful to relational financing. It then
applies theoretical insights to problems
of institutional transition in two Asian
economies. It argues that the Japanese financial
system will retain some aspects of relational
financing even after the impending financial
deregulation, although there will be a significant
reduction in the bank's role in corporate
governance. Finally, it assesses that the
ongoing experiment of main bank relationship
in China may be one of viable financial
options for successful transition of the
planned economy to a market economy, but
cautions that more competition in the banking
sector is necessary for relational banking
to emerge as an institution.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
489
The Rise of the Middle Class and China's
Future Food Deficit
Scott D. Rozelle, Pan A. Yotopoulos, Jikun
Huang
April 1997
On of the most closely watched debates
by researchers on China's food economy addresses
the question: Will China be able to produce
most of what it needs to feed itself in
the 21st century? The preponderance of evidence
from research favors the viewpoint that
China will essentially be able to feed itself
even though future imports of grains will
most likely rise. This conclusion, to the
extent that it is based on historical data,
may not reflect the new pressures on the
food economy that emanate from structural
changes in China as a result of rapidly
rising wealth, urbanization, marketization,
and technological change. Notable among
the neglected structural factors that change
the contours of the demand for food is the
graduation of consumers from poverty to
the middle class (Yotopoulos, 1985). This
has a twofold impact on demand. First, the
income elasticity for livestock products
is higher than for food grains (which means
as income rise, more grain is demanded).
Second, the switch in classes, from one
with a food grain-based diet (and low consumption
of grains) to another with a higher level
of consumption of grain-intensive livestock
products, also creates a large jump in total
demand for grains. The size of the additional
demand depends on the number of people who
graduate to improved diets and on the difference
between the old standard at which they were
consuming and the new. While the income
elasticity of demand is accounted for in
projections, the graduation effect of the
switch in classes is often overlooked.
The purpose of this paper is to revisit
the debate on the impact of China's development
at home and in the world by systematically
exploring the implications of China's rapid
growth of income, the structure of that
income growth (or the pattern of inequality),
and the competition of consumers for food
and feed. Using a set of structural parameters
estimated by the authors from primary and
secondary data, a supply and demand modeling
framework projects the future balance of
China's major grain commodities, while explicitly
examining the impact of the new food-feed
paradigm. An upward revision of projected
demand increases the potential for short-term
grain deficits that could lead to abrupt
price rises. The concatenation of these
events will almost certainly not starve
the world; but it is likely to create serious
food security problems for those inside
and outside China who rely on food markets
and who are not in a position to pay high
prices for food in the short run.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
486
The Incentive for Non-Price Discrimination
by an Input Monopolist
Nicholas Economides
April 1997
This paper considers the incentive for
non-price discrimination of a monopolist
in an input market who also sells in an
oligopoly downstream market through a subsidiary.
Such a monopolist can raise the costs of
the rivals to its subsidiary through discriminatory
quality degradation. We find that the monopolist
always, even when it is cost-disadvantaged,
has the incentive not to raise costs to
the whole downstream industry including
its subsidiary. Moreover, increasing rivals'
costs nullifies the effects of traditional
imputation floors, and prompts the creation
of imputation floors that account for the
artificial costs imposed on downstream rivals.
The results of this paper raise concerns
about the potentially anti-competitive effects
of entry of local exchange carriers in long
distance service.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper, No.485
From Market Magic to Calypso Science
Policy
Paul A. David
February 1997
The current reconsideration of public research
funding policies in the U.S., and U.K. and
other industrialized economies makes it
important that policy makers and the public
understand the valid economic grounds for
government support of science. This review
article of a book recently published in
Britain and the U.S., which argues for the
ending of all government support of non-military
R&D, provides an occasion to take stock
of what is known about the subject. This
review article concludes that laissez-faire
science policy arguments advanced by Terrance
Kealey's book are analytically without foundation,
and are based upon distortions and misinterpretations
of the evidence of economic history, as
well as on the misuse of economic methods.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
480
The Incentive for Non-Price Discrimination
by an Input Monopolist
Nicholas Economides
January 1997
This paper considers the incentive for
non-price discrimination of a monopolist
in an input marker who also sells in an
oligopoly downstream market through a subsidiary.
Such a monopolist can raise the costs of
the rivals to its subsidiary through discriminatory
quality degradation. We find that the monopolist
always has the incentive to raise the costs
of the rivals to its subsidiary in a discriminatory
fashion, but does not have the incentive
to raise costs to the whole downstream industry
including its subsidiary. Moreover, increasing
rivals' costs nullifies the effects of traditional
imputation floors, and prompts the creation
of imputation floors that account for the
artificial costs imposed on downstream rivals.
The results of this paper raise concerns
about the potentially anti-competitive effects
of entry of local exchange carriers in long
distance service.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
482
Special Economic Zones as Catalysts for
Transition
John M. Litwack, Yingyi Qian
November 1996
One of the early strategic decisions in
Chinese reform was the establishment of
several special economic zones. These areas
received both relatively high levels of
investment and favorable tax treatment.
We interpret this strategy as an appropriate
response to two critical problems facing
the reformers at this time: (1) A limited
ability to commit due to the lack of institutions
to constrain the state from expropriation,
and (2) a political constraint to meet significant
basic requirements in social policy. The
interaction between these two problems can
cause the economy to be caught in a low-equilibrium
trap if limited resources are spread too
thinly. By concentrating resources in special
economic zones, this trap might be avoided
in at least some areas of the economy, which
could also eventually generate important
spillover effects elsewhere. Thus, in the
presence of important commitment and political
problems, special economic zones can serve
as catalysts for transition, despite the
resulting (inefficient) diversion of resources
and growth in regional inequality.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
484
Regulatory Pricing Rules To Neutralize
Network Dominance
Nicholas Economides, Giuseppe Lopomo, Glenn
Woroch
November 1996
This paper evaluates the effectiveness
of several pricing rules intended to promote
entry into a network industry dominated
by an incumbent carrier. Drawing on the
work of Cournot and Hotelling, we develop
a model of competition between two interconnected
networks. In a symmetric equilibrium, the
price of cross-network calls exceeds the
price of internal calls. This "calling circle
discount" tends to "tip" the industry to
a monopoly equilibrium as would a network
externality. By equalizing charges for terminating
calls, reciprocity eliminates differences
between internal and cross-network prices
and makes monopoly less likely. Imputation
counteracts an incentive by the dominant
network to "price squeeze" a rival by eliminating
differences in the wholesale price of termination
and the implicit price for internal use.
By increasing profits of rival networks
and increasing their subscribers' surplus,
imputation supports additional entry. Finally,
an unbundling rule reduces termination fees
charged by a network that was engaging in
pure bundling. Again, entry will be facilitated
as rival networks offer potential subscribers
a more attractive rate schedule.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
481
Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint
Yingyi Qian, Gérard Roland
September 1996
We study the relationship between the organization
of government involving fiscal decentralization
(i.e. federalism) and the degree of the
soft budget constraint. The incentives of
the government to bail out inefficient projects
are determined by the trade-off between
political benefits and (endogenous) economic
costs. Two effects of federalism are derived:
First, fiscal competition among local governments
in the presence of mobile factors increases
the opportunity costs of bailout at the
margin and thus can be viewed as a commitment
device (the "competition effect"). Second,
monetary centralization together with fiscal
decentralization may not only harden budget
constraints but also reduce inflation (the
"checks and balance effect"). Our theory
is used to interpret China's transition
to markets.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
483
Strategic Commitments and the Principle
of Reciprocity in Interconnection Pricing
Nicholas Economides, Giuseppe Lopomo, Glenn
Woroch
September 1996
We discuss the effects of strategic commitments
and of network size in the process of setting
interconnection fees across competing networks.
We also discuss the importance of the principles
of reciprocity and imputation of interconnection
charges on market equilibria. Reciprocity
means that both networks charge the same
for interconnection. Imputation means that
a network charges its customers as much
as it charges customers of the other network
for the same service. Assuming that each
consumer cannot subscribe to more than one
network, we begin by analyzing a game of
strategic symmetry where the two networks
choose all prices simultaneously. Second,
we allow a dominant network to set the interconnection
fee before the opponent network can set
its prices. This results in a price-squeeze
on the rival network. Third, we show that
the imposition of the reciprocity rule eliminates
the strategic power of the first mover.
Under reciprocity, one network sets the
common interconnection fee at cost, and
the equilibrium prices for final services
are lower than in the two previous games
without reciprocity. Moreover, prices under
reciprocity obey the principle of imputation.
In the long run, consumers subscribe to
one of the two networks. Typically, there
is a multiplicity of equilibria, including
corner equilibria, where all consumers subscribe
to the same network. However, under reciprocity,
there are no corner equilibria.
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
061
The Efficiency Cost of Acheiving Progressivity by Using Exemptions
Charles L. Ballard and John B. Shoven
October 1985 |
| top |